My favorite Christmas movie is It’s a Wonderful Life. I have watched it at least 50 times, but the final scene never fails to bring a tear to the eye of this hopelessly sentimental romantic.

The basic premise, for those of you who have never seen the movie, is how much the good deeds we do affect those around us. George Bailey, on the brink of suicide, is shown by his guardian angel Clarence how Bedford Falls, George’s community, would have changed if George had never been born.

As much as I like the movie, I have always been a little bothered by its portrayal of Bailey’s nemesis, Henry F. Potter, played brilliantly by Lionel Barrymore. Potter is the personification of “heartless capitalism.” He mistreats people, eschews charity of any kind, and has only one goal in life: the accumulation of wealth. The idea of sacrificing profit to help others is foreign to him.

I wouldn’t want to be Potter and I wouldn’t want to work for Potter. But is the picture the movie paints totally fair to Potter or, more generally, to profit-seeking capitalism? The best way to answer the question is to ask same question the movie uses to evaluate George Bailey’s contributions: what would have happened to Bedford Falls if Henry Potter had never been born?

  • The town’s bank would have failed in the depression. It survived only because Potter was there to bail it out. All of bank’s depositors, instead of getting 50 cents on the dollar, would have lost their money.
  • The Bailey Building and Loan would have failed after George’s father died. George’s incompetent Uncle Billy was slated to take over the business when George’s father died. That didn’t happen only because Henry Potter convinced the board to close it unless George took over. Without Potter’s actions as director, Uncle Billy would have taken over and almost certainly would have ruined the institution.
  • Poorer people who could not afford to build a house in George Bailey’s Bailey Park wouldn’t have rental housing available because Henry Potter wasn’t there to build it.
  • Adults in Bedford Falls would have fewer entertainment choices because the downtown bars and dancing halls wouldn’t exist. Only the amoral capitalist Potter was willing to fund businesses like that.
  • Most of the other businesses in town would not exist. They relied on Potter for capital; according to the movie, Potter controlled the entire town except for Bailey’s building and loan.

So don't be so quick to condemn Mr. Potter. Even heartless capitalists have value.

Happy holidays to all our readers from our resident Scrooge.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Colleen Baker Colleen Baker

PhD (Wharton) Professor Baker is an expert in banking and financial institutions law and regulation, with extensive knowledge of over-the-counter derivatives, clearing, the Dodd-Frank Act, and bankruptcy, in addition to being a mediator and arbitrator.

Previously, she spent time at the U. of…

PhD (Wharton) Professor Baker is an expert in banking and financial institutions law and regulation, with extensive knowledge of over-the-counter derivatives, clearing, the Dodd-Frank Act, and bankruptcy, in addition to being a mediator and arbitrator.

Previously, she spent time at the U. of Illinois Urbana-Champaign College of Business, the U. of Notre Dame Law School, and Villanova University Law School. She has consulted for the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, and for The Volcker Alliance.  Prior to academia, Professor Baker worked as a legal professional and as an information technology associate. She is a member of the State Bars of NY and TX. Read More