“‘It’s less harmful to piss off the government than piss off Google,’ Mr. Abuhazim said. ‘The government will hit me with a fine. But if Google suspends my listings, I’m out of a job. Google could make me homeless.'” #corpgov https://t.co/LisAipJZR5

— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) June 21, 2019

“we see labeling based on incomplete information, public shaming, and shunning wrapped in moral rhetoric preached with cold-hearted, self-righteous oblivion to the consequences, which ultimately fall on real people” #corpgov https://t.co/0FyB5LzRJN

— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) June 22, 2019

Is doctrinal change a response to “extra-legal factors, including interest group politics”? “Kershaw rejects this claim, offering other..accounts for the production of US corporate fiduciary law & for Delaware’s lead in attracting incorporations.” https://t.co/HpFVmTDDkD #corpgov

— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) June 21, 2019

Study: “Personal values and cultural norms … appear to dominate legal rules in shaping directors’ shareholderism stances.” https://t.co/ufLNUM2AVN #corpgov

— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) June 25, 2019

“Many legal scholars do not readily associate executive search firms (ESFs) with corporate governance, yet they are intimately connected with a key mechanism of corporate governance — elite labor markets.” https://t.co/yR7QEJqCIq #corpgov

— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) June 21, 2019