[NOTE: You should see embedded Tweets. If you don’t, please try a different browser.]

I am planning to present a 7-minute, PechaKucha-like, overview of my current WIP, "The Omnipresent Specter of Political Bias in Corporate Decision-Making" on Friday Jan. 3 (2:00pm-3:15pm), at the @FedSoc Annual Faculty Conference held in conjunction with #AALS2020. #curmudgeon https://t.co/IwD6xf2VD9

— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) October 14, 2019

"it appears that managers are frequently using materiality discretion to correct material misstatements using revisions rather than restatements" #corpgov https://t.co/mP4W1KUS51

— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) October 16, 2019

"The rise and fall of The We Company IPO bubble … [and] the subprime mortgage bubble … share … structural features that favor the expression of positive sentiments and make it difficult to express negative sentiments." #corpgov https://t.co/WHZ34xxXEp

— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) October 11, 2019

"It is now the conventional wisdom that, when managers are given great discretion over corporate investment policies, they tend to serve disproportionately their own interests, however well-intentioned managers may be" End of History for Corporate Law 89Geo.L.J.439(2001) #corpgov

— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) October 14, 2019

"recent trend where employers have sought to circumvent California’s public policy by invoking Delaware law in restrictive covenant agreements with their employees. However, in a number of recent opinions, the Delaware Court of Chancery has resisted those efforts" https://t.co/GRHcegE7sI

— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) October 13, 2019