FINRA recently filed a proposed rule change with the SEC to “to release information on BrokerCheck® as to whether a particular member firm or former member firm is currently designated as a ‘Restricted Firm.'”  A restricted firm is one that poses “a high degree of risk to the investing public, based on numeric thresholds of firm level and individual-level disclosure events.”  Essentially, these are firms with “a significant history of misconduct.”

As it stands, the public does not know which firms have been designated by FINRA as “restricted firms.” FINRA’s proposal would release this information through BrokerCheck®. This would be a strong signal to investors to more closely monitor their accounts or move them to a different brokerage. 

Only two comment letters were filed in response to the proposal.  One letter of support came from PIABA. The other was filed by Professors Nicole G. Iannarone and Christine Lazaro.  The Professors’ letter supported the proposal and urged FINRA to also “provide a plain English explanation of what restricted firm designation means on the BrokerCheck report if a firm is so designated.”  The Professors are undoubtedly right that retail customers simply won’t understand what “restricted firm” means without clear contextual information.  The Professors also recommended that information about prior times a firm has been designated as a restricted firm be disclosed.  A firm that bounces on and off the restricted list surely poses more risk to investors than the average brokerage.  Without FINRA making historical information, available investors will not be able to protect themselves and the disclosure will not have sufficient deterrent effect for firms.

Hopefully the new disclosures will be approved and implemented in a way that both informs investors and deters misconduct.