“This Article … concludes that, contrary to the predictions of both [supporters and critics], the benefit corporation has not, apparently, resulted in much change at all.” 7 Tex. A&M L. Rev. 73 #corpgov #socent
— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) November 24, 2019
“CEOs that signed on to Business Roundtable statement are still about maximizing profits in one revealing way—their statement on corporate wokeness says nothing about exorbitant CEO pay” https://t.co/pPVS9MvoJN #corpgov
— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) November 28, 2019
“the heavily-litigated personal benefit test found in Dirks may not apply to a charge of insider trading under §1348” #corpgov https://t.co/oj4O9uWdic
— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) November 27, 2019
“The ‘marketplace of ideas’ metaphor in 1A law is usually traced to the famous dissenting opinion of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in Abrams v. United States.”; “often paired with the concurring decision of Justice Louis Brandeis in Whitney v. California” 24 Comm. L. & Pol’y 437 pic.twitter.com/thG8R20luu
— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) November 24, 2019
“As the Citizens United court also explained, the cases it overruled were themselves in tension with an older line of cases …. Thus, Citizens United can plausibly be understood as restoring the overall fabric of prior law.” https://t.co/5QUEAf39IF #corpgov
— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) November 22, 2019