“Residence in tax law delineates the boundaries of distributive justice, and whereas corporations cannot be parties to a scheme of distributive justice, corporate residence is a misnomer.” https://t.co/vS82vyXZfQ #corpgov
— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) December 4, 2017
“This Article provides an efficiency explanation of state-owned enterprises in China.” https://t.co/eiEwGVigRr #corpgov
— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) December 4, 2017
“insistence upon seeing the world through the lens of free markets makes one unable to see the power dynamics at work” https://t.co/wN3tAq9Slt #corpgov
— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) December 5, 2017
ICYMI: “maximization of shareholder welfare is not the same as maximization of market value” https://t.co/Vry7Hw8cYy #corpgov
— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) December 5, 2017
Is the smart money leaning to this being the narrow basis for a 5-4 win for the baker in #MasterpieceCakeshop? “Kennedy … questioned whether the state’s civil rights commission ruling against the baker was biased against religion.” https://t.co/zFvZKAYNhP #corpgov
— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) December 6, 2017
“An eye-opening account of how corporations became ‘persons’ entitled to constitutional rights and used those rights to impede efforts to regulate them in the interests of real people.” https://t.co/KgZU9M2ryo #corpgov
— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) December 7, 2017