If you’re interested in mass litigation–either through class actions or multi-district litigation–you undoubtedly know that the area can be overwhelmingly and mind-numbingly complex. Mass Tort Deals by Elizabeth Chamblee Burch cuts through with simple language and accessible stories to help frame the key policy issues. So far, I’m through the first chapter and have some thoughts.
The book frames the key issues well–how do we balance competing interests and resolve mass tort disputes. And there are plenty of interests sitting in tension with each other: judicial economy, efficiency, judicial desires for novelty and importance, plaintiffs’ counsel fees, lead plaintiff counsel fees, defense interests in global resolution, and more. How we set the procedures up for these cases effectively controls how these cases will be resolved. If judges lock less cooperative litigants out and limit access to discovery or other information, it essentially forces them to come to the table and play ball with the court’s chosen lawyers for a case.
From someone who has studied the class action context closely, one of the most surprising things to me about norms in the non-class mass tort space has been that the leadership arrangements seemingly operate as a lawless scrum. There are
