So instead, I’ll just say, like my co-blogger Stefan who posted yesterday, I’ve also been paying attention to corporate responses to protest movement. Because we’re both talking about that subject, I’ll just start by quickly reproducing the links that I gave Stefan in my comments on his post:
Many Claim Extremists Are Sparking Protest Violence. But Which Extremists?
The Justice Department’s rhetoric focuses on antifa. Its indictments don’t.
Misinformation About George Floyd Protests Surges on Social Media
Twitter says fake "Antifa" account was run by white supremacists
And one I forgot to add:
Anyhoo, as I said, I’ve been watching how corporations are responding, but unlike Stefan, I haven’t perceived silence at all – quite the opposite. But, what corporations are saying is interesting. These are the articles that captured my attention:
Corporate Voices Get Behind ‘Black Lives Matter’ Cause (“Some companies were more cautious in their approach. Target, which is based in Minneapolis and was hit by looting at a store there last week, described ‘a community in pain’ in a blog post but never mentioned the word ‘black.’”)
What CEOs Said About George Floyd’s Death (“Few companies talked about law enforcement or other forms of authority. Dell Technologies Inc. was the only company to use the words ‘police brutality.’”)
Adidas Voices Solidarity While Closing Its Stores (“Companies like Adidas and Nike have long paid black entertainers and athletes to pitch their products, and it is often black teenagers in the country’s largest cities who determine which brands are fashionable and subsequently sell big in the white suburbs. This is a particular bone of contention for black employees at Adidas…”)
#BlackoutTuesday: A Music Industry Protest Becomes a Social Media Moment (“Beyond the confluence of hashtags, some in the music industry questioned what was being done beyond promises for reflection and general statements of support.”)
‘Blackout Tuesday’ Prompts Debate About Activism and Entertainment (“Other celebrities voiced skepticism over the efforts and concern that it would dilute more urgent forms of activism.”)
Silent No More on Race, America's CEOs Fumble for Right Words (“Unlike syrupy messages in support of nurses and essential workers fighting the coronavirus pandemic or a call for unity after 9/11, there is no happy medium for a position on white privilege.”)
Brands Have Nothing Real to Say About Racism (“Facebook and Citibank weighed in, as did the gay dating app Grindr and even the cartoon cat Garfield.”)
Ben & Jerry’s pointed call to ‘dismantle white supremacy’ stands out among tepid corporate America statements (N.B.: take a moment to absorb that this article appears in the Washington Post Food section)
People On Nextdoor Say The Platform Censored Their "Black Lives Matter" Posts (“while the company may be officially saying that it supports the Black Lives Matter movement, this week, many of its volunteer moderators took a contrary position, stifling conversations about race, police, and protests while removing comments and postings with the very phrase the company had tweeted just three days ago.”)
Venture firms rush to find ways to support Black founders and investors (“Black entrepreneurs and investors are questioning the motivations of these firms, given the weight of evidence that shows inaction in the face of historic inequality in the technology and venture capital industry.”)
SoftBank launches $100M+ Opportunity Growth Fund to invest in founders of color (“Just a couple of weeks ago, the CEO and founder of one of its portfolio companies, Banjo, resigned after it was revealed that he once had ties to the KKK.”)
For more equitable startup funding, the ‘money behind the money’ needs to be accountable, too (“Consider that already, most VCs today sign away their rights to invest in firearms or alcohol or tobacco when managing capital on behalf of the pension funds, universities and hospital systems that fund them. What if they also had to agree to invest a certain percentage of that capital to founding teams with members from underrepresented groups?”)
A statement from [Brand]® pic.twitter.com/XT9tXF9hvz
— Chris Franklin (@Campster) May 31, 2020
I’ll finish by noting that however tepid, many of the corporate statements do explicitly reference Black Lives Matter. And since even that sentiment was considered controversial a few years ago, we can safely conclude that the needle has moved.