This week I just direct your attention to various items.
First, the NYSE recently proposed a rule change that would exempt closed end funds from the requirement of holding annual shareholder meetings. Closed-end funds are frequently the subject of activist attacks – here I blogged about a Second Circuit case that struck down a takeover defense measure in a Nuveen fund – so a rule change here would be, you know, significant. Anyway, here is the link to the comments the SEC has received, and the one I found particularly useful, was by the Working Group on Market Efficiency and Investor Protection in Closed-End Funds, which is a collection of law and business professors.
Second, Project 2025 is all in the news these days as a preview of what a second Trump administration might look like, and it turns out, there are proposals for changes to the federal securities laws.
We have the usual conservative stuff, like, get rid of disclosure requirements pertaining to “social, ideological, political, or ‘human capital’ information that is not material to investors’ financial, economic, or pecuniary risks or returns.” Obviously, the issue here, unaddressed in the document, is that most commenters would