My recent article with Anthony Rickey, Uncovering Hidden Conflicts in Securities Class Action Litigation, discussed how a court-appointed special master investigating a securities class action settlement discovered a $4.1 million “referral fee” paid by Labaton Sucharow LLP (“Labaton”) to an attorney who did no work on the case but purportedly secured the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System (“ATRS”) as a client. The bombshell revelation in Arkansas Teacher Retirement System v. State Street Bank and Trust Co. (“State Street”) undoubtedly stemmed from an email by Texas attorney Damon Chargois, who wrote:
We got you ATRS as a client after considerable favors, political activity, money spent and time dedicated in Arkansas, and Labaton would use ATRS to seek lead counsel appointments in institutional investor fraud and misrepresentation cases. Where Labaton is successful in getting appointed lead counsel and obtains a settlement or judgment award, we split Labaton’s attorney fee award 80/20, period.
The State Street payment was not the first: Labaton had paid a percentage of its total fee awards in at least seven other cases. While scholars had discussed the role of “pay to play” in securities class actions for years, State Street revealed a referral agreement and raised questions about the extent of favors and political influence brought to bear.
Shortly after we published Uncovering Hidden Conflicts, Judge Wolf issued a blistering opinion in State Street, finding that “the submissions of Labaton and [the Thornton Law Firm] in support of the request for an award of $75,000,000 were replete with material false and misleading statements” and that the firms “in many respects violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b) and related Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct.” The opinion also described, in explicit detail, the origin of the relationship between Labaton, Chargois, and ATRS. Ultimately, Judge Wolf cut the fee from approximately $75 million to $60 million (the lower end of the “presumptive reasonable range”) and referred his opinion to the Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers. An appeal is pending.
The State Street case prompted an exposé in the New York Law Journal, including extensive comments from Chargois’ former (now retired) law partner, Tim Herron, and a deep-dive into the history of the ATRS/Labaton relationship. Some Arkansas lawmakers questioned ATRS’ decision to rehire Labaton during a public hearing in May. As Professor Coffee put it, “The practices [the special master] uncovered is like turning over a rock in the field and finding some ugly things crawling around.”
More, after the jump.