Corporations

Subscribe to Corporations via RSS

Business Transactional Skills Professor
University of Richmond School of Law

The University of Richmond School of Law is seeking applicants for a full-time faculty member to teach business law courses, including transactional skills courses. The position will begin in the summer or fall of 2025. The full position description is here — law.richmond.edu/faculty/hiring.html.

Our new hire will teach one section of Business Associations (our foundational business law course), Mergers & Acquisitions, and two transactional skills courses. The skills courses will emphasize experiential learning, allowing students to work on assignments that resemble the type of work they will do in practice and to develop skills as legal and business advisors to their clients. Candidates must have several years of practice experience in business transactional law and a J.D. from a U.S. accredited law school.

This is a non-tenure track position that focuses on teaching and mentoring students during the nine-month academic year. Depending on experience, a successful candidate will be hired as an Assistant or Associate Professor of Law, Legal Practice and will be eligible for promotion and five-year presumptively renewable contracts upon promotion to Professor of Law, Legal Practice.

The University of Richmond is a private university located just…

I managed to hold off for a few weeks–and then for the past 24-48 hours (or so)–in reporting back on the current state of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). But the U.S. Supreme Court has again spoken, and so it is time to do an update (since little more is likely to happen over the weekend). FinCEN, the U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, summarizes the current state of play, an update from my post earlier this month.

On January 23, 2025, the Supreme Court granted the government’s motion to stay a nationwide injunction issued by a federal judge in Texas (Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. McHenry—formerly, Texas Top Cop Shop v. Garland). As a separate nationwide order issued by a different federal judge in Texas (Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury) still remains in place, reporting companies are not currently required to file beneficial ownership information with FinCEN despite the Supreme Court’s action in Texas Top Cop Shop. Reporting companies also are not subject to liability if they fail to file this information while the Smith order remains in force. However, reporting companies may continue to voluntarily submit beneficial ownership information reports.

And so it…

…

I know this is late notice, but I have a small role in an online symposium on benefit corporations being held today at 3:30 pm Eastern (12:30 pm Pacific). The symposium features essays on Professor Michael Dorff’s recent book on benefit corporations, Becoming a Benefit Corporation. The essays will be published in a forthcoming issue of the Southwestern University Law Review. I am writing a foreword for the issue. If you have time and want to register to attend, the flyer is included above. You also can just register here.

A law firm recently reached out to me to conduct a CLE on Mental Health Challenges in the Age of AI. It was an interesting request. I’ve spoken about AI issues on panels, as a keynote speaker, and in the classroom, and I wrote about it for Tennessee Journal of Business Law. I also conduct workshops and CLEs on mental health in the profession. But I’ve never been asked to combine the topics. 

Before I discussed issues related to anxiety about job disruption and how cognitive overload affects the brain, I spent time talking about the various tools that are out there and how much our profession will transform in the very near future.

If you’re like many lawyers I know, you think that AI is more hype than substance. So I’ll share the information I shared with the law firm.

According to a  2024 Bloomberg survey on AI and the legal profession, 69% of Bloomberg survey respondents believe generative AI can be used ethically in legal practice. But they harbor “extreme” or “moderate” concerns about deep fakes (e.g., human impersonations, hallucinations and accuracy of AI-generated text,  privacy, algorithmic bias, IP, and of course, job displacement.

Those are…

I’m super excited to attend and moderate a panel on How to Improve Your Contract Skills with Gen AI Tools and Products at the ContractsCon in Las Vegas from January 22-23, 2025. As the GC for a startup and a nonprofit, and someone who directs the Transactional Skills Program for a law school, I have to stay up to date on the future of contracts for my clients and to prepare our students for a world that will be completely different from the one they expected.

This is not the typical boring CLE. How to Contract Founder, Laura Frederick describes it as “practical training for the work you do all the time.For every mega M&A transaction or financing, there are thousands of regular contracts that companies handle day-in and day-out. This training helps you learn how to do those BETTER with strategies based on best practices used by top lawyers with solid real-world in-house experience. Have a ton of experience already? This event is perfect for lawyers and professionals with 10+ years of contract experience too. We’ve added a whole day of training built to teach advanced contract skills. Plus you can connect with your peers and help out…

One of the more interesting topics that I have been following under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is the debate about the reporting status of limited liability partnerships (LLPs).  Are LLPs reporting companies under the CTA?  A recent Business Law Today article written by friends-of the-BLPB Bob Keatinge and Tom Rutledge argues they are not.

As the article notes, the debate centers around whether an LLP is an “entity” similar to a corporation or limited liability company that is “created by the filing of a document with a secretary of state or a similar office under the law of a State.”  Certainly, an LLP is created by a secretary of state filing.  However, is a new entity created by that filing, or is an LLP merely a type or status of partnership created by that filing?

I have read much on this debate over the past year and had conversations with many intelligent, experienced practitioners on both sides of the matter.  A textualist approach supports the conclusion reached by Bob and Tom in their article–that LLPs are not new entities.  Yet, detractors note that Bob and Tom’s conclusion, well supported by the history and interpretations of partnership law they present…

In a short Memorandum Opinion and Order signed late last month, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia struck down a West Virginia constitutional provision prohibiting churches from incorporating.  The case concerned Article VI, Section 47 of the West Virginia Constitution, which provides that “[n]o charter of incorporation shall be granted to any church or religious denomination.” The Court determined the West Virginia constitutional prohibition “is not neutral or generally applicable, and it does not further a compelling government interest” and therefore offends the U.S. Constitution.  Specifically, the court found that:

  • the West Virginia state constitution’s proscription of church incorporation is not neutral because “it denies incorporation to a defined class of individuals solely based upon their religion” and
  • “the State has not advanced any governmental interest, much less a compelling one, and the Court finds no compelling interest exists in prohibiting ‘any church or religious denomination’ from seeking incorporation. 

The court concludes that the provision “violates the Church’s First Amendment rights to the free exercise of religion, which is applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment.”

The case is Hope Community Church v. Warner.  You can find a copy of the court’s Memorandum…

I didn't really think it through. I actually thought that teaching Business Associations (BA) online, would mean that I would have fewer students. I'm teaching online because I have two immunocompromised parents and I don't want to take any risks. But alas, I have 90 students this semester.

Not to brag, but I'm pretty good at teaching online. I haves some students who have taken three or four classes with me online and none of them are required. But I have never taught ninety online. That number is completely contrary to best practices for online teaching and learning. 

I even tried to scare some students away. Before every semester, I ask all students to complete a Google form that helps me understand them a bit better. This lets me know how to pronounce their names, what experience they have in business, where they have worked, what classes they are taking, and what they are most interested in learning about. This survey helped me understand how many of them were taking BA and Evidence at the same time. Some masochists are taking BA, Evidence, and our Transactional Skills I course, which is incredibly time consuming. But alas, only two dropped.…

 The Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics is hosting a virtual ESG and Compliance Conference on November 7.  I love to hear academics talk about these issues at conferences but because I still engage in the practice of law and I teach about compliance, governance, and sustainability, I find the conversations are very different when listening to practitioners.

My panel is titled ESG Due Diligence Across the Corporate Lifecycle From Start-Up to Maturity: The Roles of Compliance, Ethics, Legal, and the Board. My co-panelists, Ahpaly Coradin, Partner, Pierson Ferdinand, and Eugenia di Marco, a startup founder and international legal advisor, and I will focus on:

  •  how to measure and prioritize ESG factors at different stages of a company's life cycle, according to a company's industry, and technology use.
  •  how ESG creates value in M&A  beyond risk mitigation and learn the impact of ESG on target selection, valuation, and integration.
  • board and management responsibilities in overseeing and managing ESG-related risks, particularly in light of Caremark duties and Marchand.

Date & Time: Thursday, November 7 from 12:45 PM – 1:45 PM central time

Other topics that speakers will discuss include:

  • Supply chains and European due diligence 
  • Global regulatory and legislative developments
  • Sustainable governance

…